Information on Result #473257

There is no (169, 209, 11587)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 822 916606 328372 790886 679566 314332 397648 963504 894258 440054 983024 > 2209

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (169, 210, 11587)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction