Information on Result #473279

There is no (82, 210, 159)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1755 728746 161817 862546 307095 278691 447586 681636 883583 421350 512318 > 2210

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (82, 211, 159)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction