Information on Result #473281
There is no (86, 210, 171)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1656 945622 266148 012164 722724 720692 037733 358183 733027 141607 977952 > 2210
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (86, 211, 171)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |