Information on Result #473285

There is no (94, 210, 201)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1922 030238 224627 435943 425514 864761 685297 438230 363667 930458 679184 > 2210

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (94, 211, 201)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction