Information on Result #473285
There is no (94, 210, 201)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1922 030238 224627 435943 425514 864761 685297 438230 363667 930458 679184 > 2210
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (94, 211, 201)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction |