Information on Result #473298

There is no (120, 210, 385)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1656 458867 368235 008552 673433 922458 276171 772574 291690 202868 323136 > 2210

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (120, 211, 385)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction