Information on Result #473325

There is no (174, 210, 24529)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1645 632708 827863 821363 038151 894155 577612 345189 675654 168753 123284 > 2210

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (174, 211, 24529)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction