Information on Result #473326

There is no (176, 210, 37520)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1645 568044 812917 175173 017888 385769 209958 652895 606184 240889 472328 > 2210

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (176, 211, 37520)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction