Information on Result #473346

There is no (83, 211, 162)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 4050 427566 614345 838109 877885 358827 757874 525378 721761 134177 122962 > 2211

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (83, 212, 162)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction