Information on Result #473387

There is no (165, 211, 5413)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 3303 300567 679171 594477 257675 508184 855386 664245 344590 203474 786512 > 2211

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (165, 212, 5413)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction