Information on Result #473387
There is no (165, 211, 5413)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 3303 300567 679171 594477 257675 508184 855386 664245 344590 203474 786512 > 2211
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (165, 212, 5413)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction |