Information on Result #473413
There is no (84, 212, 164)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 7025 748013 787220 972996 729772 090803 073731 068370 833834 432147 595858 > 2212
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (84, 213, 164)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |