Information on Result #473417

There is no (92, 212, 191)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 7196 650350 552955 755384 391080 142924 086563 954447 798994 453330 680807 > 2212

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (92, 213, 191)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction