Information on Result #473437

There is no (132, 212, 565)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 6928 835416 671660 058957 594848 024626 792969 612814 689055 801059 117462 > 2212

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (132, 213, 565)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction