Information on Result #473451

There is no (160, 212, 2967)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 6597 427739 764961 721498 803449 109662 316716 096034 189336 453514 086480 > 2212

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (160, 213, 2967)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction