Information on Result #473459

There is no (176, 212, 26495)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 6582 955648 307529 108731 811019 940756 487937 058485 770840 129169 936663 > 2212

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (176, 213, 26495)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction