Information on Result #473479

There is no (81, 213, 155)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 13795 937558 380264 770032 536139 979516 939674 294594 574104 160188 279294 > 2213

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (81, 214, 155)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction