Information on Result #473480
There is no (83, 213, 161)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 15531 864078 452667 604327 904545 674020 738830 193708 048215 665639 877604 > 2213
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (83, 214, 161)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |