Information on Result #473503
There is no (129, 213, 496)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 13427 917628 315833 559092 855676 008818 040024 081270 677215 161645 478289 > 2213
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (129, 214, 496)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |