Information on Result #473511

There is no (145, 213, 992)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 13456 924262 905912 262577 715137 218954 199404 968396 149149 779616 980230 > 2213

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (145, 214, 992)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction