Information on Result #473549
There is no (86, 214, 169)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 27231 038578 785054 948745 502213 995029 935214 993911 743678 702396 566274 > 2214
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (86, 215, 169)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |