Information on Result #473567
There is no (122, 214, 389)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 27883 492075 801845 344331 394924 827207 329729 971414 458775 889138 344320 > 2214
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (122, 215, 389)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |