Information on Result #473592

There is no (172, 214, 10112)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 26370 127847 103875 766234 004301 431919 556380 346577 623424 247596 839417 > 2214

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (172, 215, 10112)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction