Information on Result #473615
There is no (83, 215, 160)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 58619 630990 108911 601802 865664 639625 842972 345597 435466 418013 747230 > 2215
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (83, 216, 160)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |