Information on Result #473616
There is no (85, 215, 166)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 62361 099138 321459 508752 914049 540810 335812 648745 991849 731627 877854 > 2215
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (85, 216, 166)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |