Information on Result #473618
There is no (89, 215, 178)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 53686 980633 750749 370898 751963 612981 715295 066312 744661 060208 119616 > 2215
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (89, 216, 178)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |