Information on Result #473636

There is no (125, 215, 421)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 55261 765012 581299 555689 674827 958160 681359 115575 957856 299805 230688 > 2215

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (125, 216, 421)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction