Information on Result #473659

There is no (171, 215, 7888)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 52688 680003 594438 590253 677890 578638 028612 732099 870789 848132 360732 > 2215

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (171, 216, 7888)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction