Information on Result #473684
There is no (84, 216, 163)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 137376 409151 757959 730964 716970 996994 905987 069380 104138 319750 268426 > 2216
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (84, 217, 163)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |