Information on Result #473685
There is no (86, 216, 168)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 107772 909725 933913 197968 673038 874927 584028 659827 515173 234956 993794 > 2216
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (86, 217, 168)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |