Information on Result #473686
There is no (88, 216, 175)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 132965 025219 304952 527269 570773 034146 777112 666511 317260 337132 258018 > 2216
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (88, 217, 175)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |