Information on Result #473688
There is no (92, 216, 188)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 115429 390873 152402 561516 868631 644639 084728 686092 260909 887388 272432 > 2216
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (92, 217, 188)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |