Information on Result #473690

There is no (96, 216, 203)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 108563 003520 057292 303898 162041 068066 410518 404761 746948 657847 116336 > 2216

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (96, 217, 203)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction