Information on Result #473705
There is no (126, 216, 428)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 105953 575929 092993 497198 199098 985710 622910 516454 013243 030534 384504 > 2216
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (126, 217, 428)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |