Information on Result #473709

There is no (134, 216, 564)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 107771 908920 831897 464615 456961 811744 417983 278755 429795 247315 970450 > 2216

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (134, 217, 564)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction