Information on Result #473714

There is no (144, 216, 862)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 106029 421137 994052 277098 366725 244138 617889 080085 769364 828104 666894 > 2216

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (144, 217, 862)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction