Information on Result #473724
There is no (164, 216, 3305)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 105422 941079 552885 378730 130755 913023 358179 912812 319541 993172 641384 > 2216
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (164, 217, 3305)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |