Information on Result #473757
There is no (95, 217, 199)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 262963 443872 016206 794787 080313 052615 331591 125675 149880 735732 298720 > 2217
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (95, 218, 199)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |