Information on Result #473772

There is no (125, 217, 410)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 228046 055995 029537 435975 448815 183152 911365 754288 445414 030747 710944 > 2217

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (125, 218, 410)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction