Information on Result #473775

There is no (131, 217, 498)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 225071 103919 362786 635713 119608 651371 503567 549423 197010 458778 808128 > 2217

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (131, 218, 498)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction