Information on Result #473791

There is no (163, 217, 2830)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 211248 838426 913255 265952 284985 552906 223047 681400 694701 755125 289120 > 2217

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (163, 218, 2830)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction