Information on Result #473795
There is no (171, 217, 6492)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 210991 378298 773431 411593 119609 804963 341258 184963 950347 733030 229930 > 2217
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (171, 218, 6492)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |