Information on Result #473841
There is no (124, 218, 392)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 421350 316910 179475 173433 016955 375185 994890 554659 163582 684187 480592 > 2218
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (124, 219, 392)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction |