Information on Result #473842

There is no (126, 218, 417)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 449856 006030 559923 341831 919887 376002 321077 531188 972495 802141 757248 > 2218

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (126, 219, 417)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction