Information on Result #473843

There is no (128, 218, 444)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 453014 646107 609837 318917 144811 502361 159649 151419 114603 038514 644068 > 2218

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (128, 219, 444)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction