Information on Result #473863

There is no (168, 218, 4255)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 422162 889756 228937 505226 750427 317914 846183 060904 940312 732741 896952 > 2218

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (168, 219, 4255)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction