Information on Result #473865
There is no (172, 218, 6692)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 422471 272573 730924 873623 645218 851004 722676 746104 255214 592556 099080 > 2218
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (172, 219, 6692)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |