Information on Result #473892
There is no (89, 219, 176)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 915727 790571 295764 460800 575474 707274 776961 165775 329792 362623 209154 > 2219
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (89, 220, 176)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |