Information on Result #473913
There is no (131, 219, 482)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 882585 488628 112177 549014 239582 099959 099369 216695 704634 493574 997520 > 2219
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (131, 220, 482)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction |