Information on Result #473932

There is no (169, 219, 4376)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 845970 493174 164602 698320 148225 303617 304286 363901 198763 845004 265232 > 2219

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (169, 220, 4376)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction