Information on Result #473959
There is no (84, 220, 161)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1 919350 923925 641292 818171 764642 279395 163825 161227 539789 943364 925552 > 2220
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (84, 221, 161)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |