Information on Result #473963

There is no (92, 220, 185)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1 706429 138885 210968 579771 863379 140074 422287 870342 311863 171054 525674 > 2220

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (92, 221, 185)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction