Information on Result #473963
There is no (92, 220, 185)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1 706429 138885 210968 579771 863379 140074 422287 870342 311863 171054 525674 > 2220
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (92, 221, 185)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction |